Everybody should have a net worth target to shoot for by age, work experience, and income. Net worth targets will help you stick to your financial plan and motivate you to do more. With net worth targets, you will likely build way more wealth than if you had zero net worth targets.
Too many people wake up 10 years later and wonder where all their money went. If only they could have a net worth guide that kept pushing them when falling behind. They could print it out and stick on their refrigerator to keep them on track. Lucky for you, you've found one.
Below is my net worth targets guide to shoot for. The net worth targets are based on a multiple of gross income, regardless of your savings rate.
Use A Net Worth Target Based On Income Instead Of Expenses
Using a multiple of gross income helps keep you disciplined as your income grows. A multiple of gross income also helps keep you honest on your path to financial freedom. The more you make, the more you are forced to save and invest. You can't just slash costs to achieve financial independence.
If you start subsisting on ramen noodles and water, your financial independence number is probably not real. If you don't do anything to change a suboptimal situation, like quit your job or leave a bad marriage, your financial independence is likely not real either.
My goal is for you to have a target net worth to shoot for by age or years worked so you will eventually achieve financial independence. Once you achieve financial independence, you will gain the ultimate courage to live your ideal life.
Net Worth Targets By Age, Years Worked, Income
Below is my net worth targets by age, years worked, and income. The key net worth target to shoot for is 20X your average gross income. Once you've achieved 20X your average gross income, I consider you to be financially free.
Once your net worth is equal to 20X or more your gross income, you are free to keep working, retire, or downshift to a different career that pays less money. You can use your highest annual gross income as a multiple or average your last three years of gross income.
Amassing a net worth equal to 20X your average annual gross income will be hard. But good news! Once you have a minimum portfolio balance of $300,000 you will start feeling free. And once your net worth reaches 10X your average annual gross income, that's when the feeling of financial independence starts kicking in.
Main Ages And Net Worth Target Multiples
Age 25: Have a net worth equal to 0.5X your annual gross income
Age 30: Have a net worth equal to 2X your annual gross income
Age 35: Have a net worth equal to 5X your annual gross income
Age 40: Have a net worth equal to 10X your annual gross income
Age 50: Have a net worth equal to 15X your annual gross income
Age 55 – 60: Have a net worth equal to 18X your annual gross income
Age 60+: Have a net worth equal to 20X your annual gross income
Using a multiple of income is better than using a multiple of expenses for your net worth target so you can stay more disciplined. As your income grows, your net worth target will also grow. Meanwhile, you can't “cheat” your way to financial independence by slashing expenses.
Although the multiples may sound daunting, try to shoot for a net worth equal to 10X your average gross income. Once you get to a net worth equal to 10X your average gross income, that's when you've accumulated enough to start FEELING free with more choices to do what you want.
Checkout my Investment Threshold Ratio for more on when full-time work starts becoming optional.
These net worth target figures are for those who:
- Take action rather than complain about an unfair system
- Max out their 401k and IRA every year
- Save an additional 20% or more after taxes and 401k/IRA contribution
- Take calculated risks through investments in various asset classes
- Build multiple streams of active and passive income
- Work on a side hustle before or after their day job
- Focus on the big picture and don't nitpick with minutiae
- Want to achieve financial freedom sooner with their one and only life
In the beginning, it's difficult to get started due to growing student loan debt, wage stagnation, and increased competition for good paying jobs due to globalization.
Despite expectations of a large generational wealth transfer, inheritances usually won't happen until much later in life. But after about 10 years in the workforce, you will start to build momentum. Achieving the net worth targets based on higher multiples will get easier.
What If You Started Working Later?
If you so happened to have delayed entering the work force because you decided to go to graduate school or go travel the world like a lot of wealthier college graduates do nowadays, no problem!
Simply follow the “Years Worked” column to find your appropriate multiple. For example, if you're 30 years old with no work experience because you spent your 20s getting a PhD, your target net worth multiple is 0.
If you have a $200,000 income, you have a top 10% income. A top 1% income is over $500,000 today.
Big Inheritance To Boost Net Worth
On the flip side, partly because of such large inheritance expectations, I expect Millennials and Gen Xers to see significant injections to their net worths after the age of 45. Another reason the target multiples of gross income after are higher as we age is because all of us become much more savvy with our money.
When we're older, no longer can we cry ignorance for not knowing how to properly asset allocate our investments. With the proper asset allocation, you'll be able to better weather any storms.
Further, we become more knowledgeable about long-term investment trends. One such trend is real estate crowdfunding, where one can finally invest in real estate across the country 100% passively. I've personally invested $954,000 in private real estate funds to take advantage of heartland real estate.
By our 40s, we've already gone through 20 years of money making wins and losses. Surely, by now we should all understand our monthly budgets, net worth compositions, spending tendencies, risk tolerance, and the importance of tracking our money.
I get much more pushback on my net worth targets from folks in their 20s and 30s than folks in their 40s and beyond. The reason is because when we are young, we think we know what we don't know. We are more stubborn and less experienced.
As we age, we see the positive effects of compounding that really starts to snowball with a larger financial nut. Accumulating the second million is much easier than the first.
Easier To Live On Less When Older
Being able to comfortably live on less is one of the biggest reasons why it's easier to hit higher net worth target multiples as you age. The older you get, the desires of your youth slowly fade away because you've been there, done that.
For example, when I was in my 20s, all I wanted to do was drive different types of luxury cars. After going through more than 10 different cars after college, all I want is one understated car that is reliable and safe.
Let's say you have a $2 million net worth and make $200,000 a year at age 50. Your net worth multiple is 10X, while I suggest it should be closer to 15X. If you can find a way to live comfortably off only $150,000 a year, or 25% less, then you're spot on target at 15X.
If you can live off $100,000, then you can retire immediately due to a 20X multiple. In other words, the more money you make and the more money you accumulate, the easier it is to adjust your spending downward.
Growing Your Net Worth As A Retiree
For the first two years after leaving Corporate America, I was making around 70% less than I did while working. Funny enough, my after-tax savings rate still was around 50%. I just became super frugal by cutting out all extraneous expenses. I found joy in the things I already had.
Saving money is also easier when you don't work because there are lots of free activities and discounts during working hours such as free museum week days, early bird dinner specials, the ability to enjoy free parks, libraries, hikes, etc. Your commuting costs go down and you no longer have to shop for work related clothes.
As a retiree, the biggest X factor are medical expenses and long term care costs. We currently pay $2,300 a month for a platinum health insurance plan for a family of three. Not cheap by any means, but affordable after a couple decades of aggressive saving.
I'm really what I consider a fake retiree. The reason why is because I operate this website that generates online income. It takes work writing and updating this articles since I started Financial Samurai in 2009.
Further, I spent two years during the pandemic writing my Wall Street Journal bestseller, Buy This, Not That: How To Spend Your Way To Wealth And Freedom. I received a book advance and will receive royalties.
Hence, even in retirement, I continuously am building my family's net worth. Having a net worth target to shoot for keeps me focused.
Easy Net Worth Target Multiples To Remember
The major age milestones everybody thinks about are 25, 30, 40, 50, and 60. As a result, I've made it easy for everybody to remember what multiple of their average gross income for the past three years to shoot for.
- Age 25: shoot for a net worth equal to 0.5X your average gross income
- Age 30: 2X your average gross income
- Age 40: 10X your average gross income
- Age 45: 13X your average gross income
- Age 50: 15X your average gross income
- Age 60: 20X your average gross income
Again, these are only targets. If you find yourself way behind at your age, not to worry. Get motivated to save and invest more aggressively! The key net worth target is to get to at least 10X your annual gross income.
My Net Worth Target When I Left Work In 2012
When I left work in 2012 at the age of 34, my net worth equaled roughly 15X my average income over the last three years. In other words, I fell short of my 20X income target. However, thanks to a severance package that equaled roughly six years of living expenses, I was more confident to leave.
Since 2012, I have grown my net worth by building an online business. I've also watched my investments grow with this bull market. Meanwhile, I've lowered the amount of income I need to be happy.
One of the most pleasant surprises about early retirement is needing roughly 30% less that I thought was necessary. So many people forget that once they retire, they no longer need to save for retirement.
I've been well over the 20X income multiple for the past several years. No longer do I fear running out of money or being forced to live a lower standard of living.
Multiple income buffers such as passive income, online income, and the occassional consulting income ensure financial security.
Remember 20X Gross Income For A Net Worth Target
With a net worth equal to 20X your gross income, even if your net worth provided zero returns, it would still take 20 years to exhaust your wealth while maintaining your same standard of living.
You could of course invest your wealth in a risk free asset like Treasury bonds to extend the life of your principal. Or you could take slightly more risk and try and earn a higher return to increase your odds of your nest egg never running out.
Just know that once you've achieved a net worth of 20X your gross income, your goal is to never lose money again. This is the first rule of financial independence! Once you've got enough money to live the way you want, there's no need to take excess risk.
The beauty about a 20X multiple is that you don't have to wait until you're over 60 to permanently leave work behind. If you can figure out a way to achieve 20X earlier, all the better!
There are too many middle-aged folks who wake up one day and wonder where all their money went because they didn't stay on top of their money. When all they want to do is take it easy, they're faced with the harsh reality that decades more work is their only option.
If you want to achieve a greater net worth after 20X, you can check out my extreme net worth targets to shoot for!
Achieve Your Net Worth Targets With Real Estate
To help you achieve your net worth targets, I highly suggest investing in real estate. Real estate is my favorite way to achieving financial freedom. It is a tangible asset that is less volatile, provides utility, and generates income.
Roughly 40% of my net worth is in real estate compared to 30% in stocks. My real estate holdings also generate roughly $150,000 a year in passive income.
Given interest rates have come way down, the value of rental income has gone way up. The reason why is because it now takes a lot more capital to generate the same amount of risk-adjusted income.
Take a look at my two favorite real estate crowdfunding platforms.
Fundrise: A way for all investors to diversify into real estate through private eFunds. The platform has been around since 2012 and manages almost $3 billion for over 350,000 investors. Fundrise focuses in industrial and residential real estate in the Sunbelt region, where valuations are lower and yields are higher.
CrowdStreet: A way for accredited investors to invest in individual real estate opportunities mostly in 18-hour cities. 18-hour cities are secondary cities with lower valuations and higher rental yields. Growth is potentially higher too due to job growth and demographic trends. If you have more capital, you can build your own select real estate portfolio with CrowdStreet.
There is an opportunity to invest in high-quality commercial real estate at lower valuations. Prices have declined almost as much as they did during the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, despite the economy and household balance sheets being much stronger. As a result, I see opportunity.
I've personally invested $954,000 in real estate crowdfunding across 18 projects, $300,000 of which is in Fundrise. My goal is to take advantage of lower valuations in the heartland of America. Both platforms are long-time sponsors of Financial Samurai.
Manage Your Money In One Place
Sign up for Empower, the web's #1 free wealth management tool to get a better handle on your finances. In addition to better money oversight, run your investments through their award-winning Investment Checkup tool. See exactly how much you are paying in fees. I was paying $1,700 a year in fees I had no idea I was paying.
After you link all your accounts, use their Retirement Planning calculator. It pulls your real data to give you as pure an estimation of your financial future as possible.
Once you link up over $100K in investable assets, you can get a free consultation and financial review with a registered investment advisor. It's always nice to get a professional to review how you're doing.
I've been using Empower since 2012. As a result, I have seen my net worth skyrocket during this time thanks to better money management.
Net Worth Targets By Age, Income, Or Work Experience is a Financial Samurai original post. Join 60,000+ others and sign up for my free weekly newsletter. I've been helping people achieve financial independence since 2009.
everywhere I read people say at least 25X. And some people now are saying 40 to 50X?
Thoughts on using a multiple x annual expenses vs. income? Some of us in sales have massive variations year to year in income. Those of us who are good stewards of our money, sock away more money (vs. increasing living expenses) in a great year. But the amount same and accrued I don’t believe gets close to 20x. For instance, last 3 years: $125k one year x 25 = $3.125M, one year $105k ($2.625M), one year $275k ($6.875). Expenses, average around 75-100k/annually across the same 3-year span. 50 year old.
You can do both. I prefer income, the average income of the last three years, because pushes me to save more and invest more as income gross overtime generally. I don’t want to cheat my way to financial independence.
Using a multiple of income is also the third rule of FIRE that I established back in 2009.
Good Evening. I’m 41 with a wife and 6 year old. I make $150k a year in the federal government. I’m also a officer in the Air Force Reserves. Salary is the combined salary between fed and reserves. I should have a $85k pension with my Federal civilian and Reserve pension combined. I have saved $160k cash and $110k in my 401k. My home has about $200k in equity (home value $700k owe $460k). I’m only contributing 5% towards my 401k and federal government matches 5% (due to my pension). Am I in a good place with my pension and savings combined or should I be worried?
Need some more information:
1 “on track” for _what_ and _when_
2 what are your expenses and typical cash flow per month?
3 do you plan to pay for some, or all, of your child’s college?
4 does your pension apply to your spouse if you were to die?
5 does your spouse have an income, or future plans to?
6 is your cash your emergency fund?
7 any other debts ?
Hi Thomas. Thanks for the reply. Please see the following:
1) Both pensions start at 57 (when i’d like to retire) and they are inflationary adjusted ($85k in today’s dollars).
2) After-tax take home income is around $9k per month and I try to limit monthly expenses to $7.5k per month.
3) I plan on helping my daughter with her college expenses.
4) There is a survivor benefit to my pensions.
5) Right now, wife is a substitute teacher – makes maybe $10k per year. We may start a home business or something (day-care?)
6) I keep $30k for emergency fund and have $130k in the market.
7) I have $0 debt other than my mortgage ($2.7k per month – $460k balance)
If you need more info, let me know! Thanks!
Hello John Q,
Your question was: “should I be worried”.
–> I don’t think you should be worried, just be vigilant.
You are young and seem to be reasonable and responsible with your expenses and debt.
My assumptions:
* I am assuming you have been working for about 8 years, and have saved up (130K + 110K = 240K), or about $30K per year.
* Over the next 16 years, along with some compounding, you should be way past the $1 million dollar mark. At 59.5, you’ll have penalty-free access to your 401k, in case you need more funds than your pensions provide.
* I am assuming your pension has health benefits to cover you and spouse between 57 and 65
* I am assuming that college expenses are not too excessive in 2035
* I am assuming you have (or will have) a 15-year term life insurance policy of $2million to hedge against not reaching the age of 57 to claim the pension.
Keep up the great work, and Thank You for your contributions and dedication to the US Air Force.
Sam, I appreciate your trying to encourage and rationalize targets for savings based on income levels and years worked, but it’s pure fantasy for most people. Otherwise, why does the average retiree have approximately $145,000 or less saved? Do you consider them financially illiterate or unmotivated?
If you are making $50K to $100K a year before taxes (and before your mortgage or rent, food, insurance, saving for two college tuitions, car or transportation expenses, clothing, utilities, etc.) and trying to support a family of four in a major city, you would be lucky to save anything.
Get real my friend. I wonder what percentage of Americans have a net worth of $5M or more unless they were a CEO or VP of a large company.
With so many people having been laid off (60,000 tech workers in the past few months) and record inflation, I’m sorry to say you sound a bit “tone deaf.”
Also, your statement about how you negotiated a separation agreement of six times (?) your annual living expenses is just ludicrous for most people to hear. I don’t think Elon Musk was offering his former employees such deals.
Thank you Neale. What targets would you use by age to help you feel better and more realistic and why?
I can dial down the targets so we can shoot to be closer to average.
Maybe I can lower the net worth targets when the tech sector is laying people off, and raise the net worth targets when the tech sector is booming.
FYI: The U.S. tech industry accounts for about 8.9 million people in the total workforce of 158 million (5%), according to CompTIA ‘s “State of the Tech Workforce” report. Even though there have been several layoffs in the tech and media industries, other labor markets have been steady.
100,000 layoffs = 0.06% of total labor force.
Hi Neale,
I am this kind of average person you are talking about. Even worse because I am a first generation immigrant who came here at age of 30 and started from zero. Because of that I had a late career start at 38 (including undergrad degree and doctorate). Married, two children at the time, wife did not get a full time job until couple of years later. We had to make money working odd jobs to pay for college and that is why it took so long to start a career. My first year I made $32K. This year after 35 years of university teaching I finally retired making $90K. For many years my wife and I made jointly under 100K, yet we sent children to college, paid off our first home, bought our first rental property, lived frugally, invested. 17 years later we were worth $1 million, second took 6 more years (despite 2008-2009 crisis), and so on. Since you mentioned 5m, I can only say I retired with much more and a solid stream of passive income besides Social Security much of which we save and invest. I agree, not many will make it to $5 million and it’s not easy, yet quite possible even if you don’t have a CEO salary and receive zero inheritance.
Best wishes on your path to financial security.
Neale,
As of Oct 2023, about 4% of American households have a $5MM+ Net Worth.
There are about 131.4 MM American households, so 4% of 131.4MM = about 5,256,000 American households have a net worth over $5MM.
That is a whoooooole lot more people than just “CEOs through VPs” of the S&P 500.
Read every page of Financial Samurai here, and also read The Millionaire Nextdoor if you are interested to lean how it is done and what these households typically look like.
Getting rich was the easiest thing I ever did, but it took 22 years to do it (from age 22 – 44).
Great article! I have a net worth higher than my income right now which is great at age 26! These targets can be tough to hit though especially if your income is growing rapidly. My income has almost doubled from 23 to now (26), but I’ve been trying to keep my savings rate steady and increase my savings rate as it’s grown. One of my goals is to have $100k between my savings accounts, retirement accounts, and a brokerage account. Then it’s to build up a brokerage account to $100k as fast as possible to build a cushion and create even more flexibility for my lifestyle.
“Shouldn’t” be too hard to hit with your income growing rapidly right?
Either way, keep the solid financial habits going. In 10 years you’ll have more wealth than you will have expected.
Hi Sam. Enjoy all your posts. Maybe a stupid question but, when you measure net worth (I’m an older guy so looking at the 20x mark), do you include primary residence and vacation homes or liquid assets only? Choosing to not carry a mortgage on property has tied up $$ which I’m OK with (little bit belt and suspenders I know) but want to see if that factors into your calculation. TY!
Totally fine to include the home equity as part of your net worth. After all, you can borrow against it or sell the property to realize it. Just take a discount based on taxes and commissions.
if your net worth is say $2M at age 50 then (and it’s all in the stock market, for example) then it will $4M by age 60, so why would you need it to $3M at age 50?
The table suggests, based on $200k income, you should be increasing net worth by $600k between ages 30 to 35. That comes about saving/investing 70% of your income after taxes paid. Is it realistic?
Investment growth too.
Can I count the equity value of my business if I work as a self employed individual where the typical value of the business
Hi Sam. Is this chart that identifies net worth by income updated for 2019 and beyond? It is located here: https://www.financialsamurai.com/how-much-should-my-net-worth-or-savings-be-based-on-income/
I want to make sure that my personal financial growth matches up to your current guidance.
Also, is the goal you recommend 20X expenses or 20X gross income?
Thanks!
Shoot for 20X gross income!
A lot of people complained about the 20X gross income and argued for 20X expenses, but it’s better to go for income.
Don’t buy the 20X Gross income threshold. I am ready to buy 50X Annual Expenses.
I have friends saving 80% of their Monthly income to attain FIRE. In such cases, 20X Gross Income doesn’t make a lot of sense.
Why doesn’t it make sense in that case? Just curious
Because if I make 500,000 per year then by the 20x rule I would need 10 million saved to retire comfortably. Lets say I’m 40 or 50 years old and I live well and happy on 150,000 per year, then even earning no return on principal and no social security or inheritance, or whatever, it provides for 66 years of income.
I think if you have tried to save for early retirement then you are in the practice of spending much less then your gross income, or isn’t even an option. It isn’t like you are changing your lifestyle and spending more in retirement. Actually alot of expenses such as dining and gas/auto care etc tend to drop.
So in this scenario, 8x gross income and a conservative 4% annual return on investment would provide 0 loss of principal and dying with 4mill in bank. Seems sufficient.
Sam great read… I have to say that living in CA housing market, the posts about saving a bunch of money living off only $200k is easier said then done. equity plays a huge part of NW. I pride myself on saving and 30% of gross is as good as I can get done barring an emergency. Also, the posts on living expenses vs. income as a calculation is not exactly accurate at first glance , I feel as you are still taxed on that money, correct? I am not sure how that tax is calculated purely in a calculation of expenses x multiple. Getting to $5m seems a task. I think the plan is save, sell the house and get out of CA?
Just a comment for young savers. When you add kids and house, costs can increase at a surprising rate. I used to live on $15k per year when single (albeit 20 years ago). Now it’s close to 10x that, and I consider myself relatively frugal.
20x gross income?? That makes little sense to me. Especially if your retirement expenses are far lower than your working life expenses. More savings is always better but not at cost of working another decade unnecessarily. I plan around 22.5x retirement expenses. Firecalc supports that.
Hi Sam — just curious about the expected return rate on the 20X figure. Seems like that is assuming a 5% return (with no dipping into principal). Given today’s interest rates, seems like a high expectation… wouldn’t 3% be more realistic? And if so that would be more like 30X…right?
Thanks,
-Ben
I think your net worth table is interesting, but the interpretation is something like: This should be your goal for savings to get you to the 20x by 60 (or something similar). A 20x NW is really a 5% withdrawal rate. So this is a different view on the standard rule of thumb – which was usually 4% for 30 years of retirement to slightly less these days according to most planners.
Many of your readers are probably interested in retiring early and want to know when they can be serious about taking the plunge. This table is not that helpful for that question because the focus is increasing savings until the 20x at 60. A more interesting table is the same columns but the factors and values are such that you would be comfortable at any age to retire. So if at 60 you need 20x at 50 you need more – say 27x. The interpretation of the table would be – At whatever age you hit this (age, NW) mark you should feel comfortable trying out early retirement.
Hi Dan, I’ll make it more clear to help you another readers understand The chart. Because I have an original post.
If you can get the 20 X your average household income, no matter your age, I declare you as financially independent and can retire early if you want, at whatever age.
When you refer to “average household income” in the 20 X recommendation, are you referring to NET or GROSS?
Thanks Sam.
I’m referring to your gross average household income over the past three years, since top line can’t be manipulated.
But you are welcome to use the average NET income if you want to be more aggressive.
I had the same doubt. Isn’t gross income more aggressive than net (since it will be after taxes and lower)? Great articles. Read a lot of yours thanks.
specifically I am at 350K gross and 180k net. So 20X 180K will be way lower than 20x 350K. Also out household expenses are way lower than your calculation. In that case should I calculate 20 K my yearly expenses? Thx
Yes. Using gross income is more aggressive. Therefore, it also makes you more conservative by boosting your net worth to a higher level before retiring.
But really, once you reach about 10X annual gross income, you will start to free a freedom and levity. I just noticed that with a net worth at 20X gross income, you are finally totally free to do whatever you want.
I hope you can pick up a hard copy of my bestseller, Buy This, Not That: How To Spend Your Way To Wealth And Freedom! You’re going to love it.
Sam, is there an easy way to translate your advice – graphs, financial goals etc. for someone planning on moving to England?
Can you recommend a British counterpart of yours or something? :)
Most of my life I made much less than I do now. It was only in the last 8 years that my income jumped and I played catch-up. If the first 3/4 I made much less, but now make much more. How do you suggest I calculate?
I believe that if you want to have a higher net worth, or more importantly wish to retire young, the key is to start in your youth. With compound interest on your side, starting to contribute to a Roth ira at 16 can be the most beneficial decision in your life. I built up an extensive savings by the age of 15 working at the golf course and with my stock portfolio. At 16 I opened up a Roth IRA with my Etrade broker and begun contributing. My goal is to max out the IRA ($5,500) every year so that when I am out of college I will already be more than 5 years ahead of my peers. With compound interest on my side this will allow me to retire much younger than anticipated.
Sam – Is this total net worth (i.e., includes home equity) or liquid net worth? Thanks.
Total net worth. Thx
Thanks for the crazy fast response, Sam.
I’m 45, husband 48. Large gorgeous house (bought long ago in SF Bay Area) in wonderful area is conservatively worth 500k, could be as much as 650k+ with cosmetic improvements in current market (though no intention to ever move). 250k equity, very low monthly payment on 265k mortgage (40% or less than market rate for comparable rent). Credit is shot but not a lot of need to borrow for anything. Very low income. I’m self-employed making $15k-$25k (could go higher with 10x more hustle). He’s making $50k/year in blue collar job working 80 hours a week (but he loves it, keeps him out of trouble). 2 amazing resourceful kids in public school and doing low-cost activities. 1 old car we love. Very good at living on not much money. $225k in Vanguard IRA. $12k debt incurred last year for medical expense, intend to refinance it (also claimed it on taxes). How are we doing? Do I calculate correctly that our net worth is ~$500k (IRA plus house)?
I hope someone will answer — in past comments I have found us low-income types don’t get any attention on this blog, but I totally agree with FS principles (and just read Millionaire Next Door). I have several streams of passive income and am building them up (currently they are making $300/month income and that’s enough to make me take notice!). Also working on remodeling a space to Air BnB it for additional passive income.
65 to 75k is low income? That’s well above the median income in the US and around the median in the bay area ) Your income may not be as high as some but you are not low income.
I think you are calculating your net worth correctly given the numbers you have reported. You are at about a NW to income multiple of 6.5 to 7.5, which is pretty low for your age. So to answer your question of how you are doing… Not great.
Thanks for replying! You actually gave me a boost with your comment that we are not low income.
However, this 2015 table from has the following definitions for Alameda County, family of 4:
moderate (!) income for family of 4 = $112,200
median = $93,500 (as I thought)
low income = $71,600
very low = $46,750
extremely low = $28,050
Wow! If we were pulling in 6 figures, while still spending as little as we do now, WE’D BE SO RICH. Or is that flawed thinking? Save now today matter how much you make?
Anyway, thanks and at least I’m on the right path in knowing where we stand. Much more to do in terms of savings and safety net. Could be cool for FS to do an article on how people like us live so well in such an expensive area — it still seems like his focus is on high earners even when he wonders how people live in Manhattan or SF. I super appreciate his perspective on SF Bay being worth it. Love LA but there are too many people there.
As a CFP I appreciate what you do and your straightforward Keep It Simple Stupid Kiss approach to building wealth and savings for retirement. Cheers. Next time youre in Ann Arbor would love to grab a beer✌️
My husband and I are both 31 with a 2X multiple. We had no student debt when we graduated together at age 21, but we also had three kids in our 20s and I “retired” at 24 to stay home with them, even though I had the higher income. It has been worth it, but I cringe a bit when I consider what our multiple would be if I had kept working…
Don’t cringe at that. My wife did the same thing in the same situation. She was making six figures in TN and retired at 26. She is the best mom i would have imagined her to become. I do carry more weight on my shoulders for it but the lifestyle of having a great full stay at home mom is amazing. Own a small business that has taken off during covid (one of the lucky ones) and I don’t have a financial direction right now and it is driving me crazy. 30 years old net worth 2M yearly income 400k. Concerned I won’t hit my 40 year old goal because I don’t know what it is yet.
Another great post Sam. I read this when it came out but looked again today. To the Canadians on the forum, you definitely need to make appropriate adjustments in your thinking while considering the wealth targets. Our taxes are overall considerably higher making saving much more difficult particularly above $200K (but true throughout the spectrum). Our health care is conversely much more affordable so less of a consideration for retirement needs, at the moment anyway. Our government sponsored social benefits on retirement are approximately half those available to our US friends in the foreseeable future (I’m talking CPP+OAS versus SS when both are at the max level). In general our costs of living are higher in many categories but Toronto and Vancouver would be comparable with SF, Boston, or NY in round numbers. There are many more differences, and some of these are quite material when you are talking about your retirement passive income or capital scenarios. So, puts and takes for sure that we Canucks need to related to. Otherwise, the analysis is very helpful and while aggressive, that’s good and in the spirit of the FS approach.
Using the Mint App, my net worth is still negative with all my student loans. At 29 that is pretty depressing. I’m slowly building up my wealth, but I’m going to have to do something drastic to meet those target goals. How much do kidney’s go for on the black market?
Thanks for sharing!
I heard in IRAN kidney’s get sold for $5,000!
For some reason, your comment really resonated with me. I clearly remember the day I got to a positive net worth. I thought, “I’m finally breaking even.” Then I thought, “I’m worthless” What a great day!
Hi! I like your site! Thank you! I just stumbled into it when googling for buying RE on leverage led me to one of your past posts. Your site has interesting reads and makes me think…
I’m 40 and my NW including RE reached 21 x Income. But my semi-liquid assets (including retirement) is at 18 x expense. Reverse of Tenser’s situation due to difference in ratio of RE and ‘semi-liquid’ assets, income & expense being not much different. Do equities in retirement accounts count as ‘semi-liquid’ assets?
Hi Sam,
speaking from where I live, perhaps there are two groups and not one single chart as you have it.
Two observations:
[i] There is a ‘critical mass’ net worth amount, that varies where you live. Once you hit that level, investing to gain new income streams gets much easier. In Bay Area I propose that’s around $2-3M.
[ii] I’ve come across 2 groups of wealth-builders: achieved CM early (say, age 35-40) and later (will get CM by say 55-65). Not many fit in between, so I see 2 groups with a 20 year gap. The second group I am familiar with mostly have a slow flat line of nw growth until they moved here and then it suddenly jumped up due to opportunity.
Explanation –
Anecdotally, all the Group 1 folks I’ve met got there fast through right place/right time opportunity at a new business venture(s). I observe that many 30-somethings who have net worth CM have >$3M nw got there through “being here”. Now they can invest and achieve that smoothly rising growth chart you show.
All of (us) Group 2 folks lacked the opportunity to be early so our chart will almost certainly have lower numbers until we too “get lucky” and catch up. Example, in my case, raised in small town NE rust belt, hardworking culture but places like Manhattan and SF were *not* on my parents or neighbors radar. (In my home county, I estimate $0.5M nw is regarded as CM).
Once I got to the Valley, things changed and I too got a connected, met cool people and got relatively lucky. Where I came from, we had to seek out new-technology, tools and startup news but here, its in your face daily; one drinks from a fire hose of information leading to opportunity. So, even though I and others started late, we caught up quickly. Our charts are not linear.
Dave in San Jose