Why I’ll Never Rent Again And Neither Should You

Why I'll Never Rent Again And Neither Should You

If you want to get rich, own real estate. Never rent again because the return on rent is negative 100% every month.

Here's a story why you should never rent if you want to get wealth. Frankly, I'm shocked the guy still has a following given his financial history. It just goes to show that anything can happen in America.

Why I'll Never Rent Again

A financial adviser by the name of Carl Richards wrote a perplexing post called, “How A Financial Pro Lost His House.” To summarize, Carl bought more house than he could afford and decided to strategically stop making his mortgage payments and turn the keys over to the bank when the house lost value.  Gee, how unoriginal.

What is original is that Carl proceeded to write a book entitled “The Behavior Gap: Simple Ways to Stop Doing Dumb Things With Money” coming out in January, 2012.  Hot dog!  He's planning on making even more money off the rest of us who already bailed him out.  At least he shouldn't call himself a “financial pro”.  Maybe he can do the right thing and donate his book's proceeds to charity, or pay back the debt he ran away from!  Nahh.

In the securities industry, if you cheat your clients and do the unethical thing, you lose your license.  In the financial advisory industry, if you do the same, I guess you get to write for the NY Times, get a book contract, and make more money!

Where Is The Credibility?

What makes Carl's article so polarizing is that he tells us his story is unique, and tries to garner sympathy from readers for having to move back to Utah from Las Vegas. During the 2008 – 2009 financial crisis, thousands of people have lost their homes Carl.  You are only unique because you think you're a financial pro and actually make money off of people for financial advice.  

He writes, “We love where we live now. Still, there are consequences. We lost our home. It’s not clear when we’ll be in a position to become homeowners again.”  You better not dare get a home loan again after making the bank, and ultimately taxpayers foot your bill!

Carl took out a 100% loan, and then took out a home equity line of credit to live an even more extravagant lifestyle.  So when he talks about “losing his home”, it's a farce because it was never his to begin with.  

Now do you understand what happens when you have no skin in the game and pay no federal taxes? Essentially, Carl lived in a 3,800 square foot McMansion for years for FREE.  

It would be one thing if he put down 20-30% following my 30/30/3 home buying rule, and then lost his home. It would be another thing if he put 20% down, lost his home, and kept mum about it. But to put 0% down and lose his home is not losing his home!

Delusional Attitude About Money

Even more perplexing is that he writes how good he's doing now. “As for Cori and me, things are much better now. Moving back to Utah clearly was the right choice. The business is doing well, and we’ve managed to pay down most of our debt. It would be easy to say that we’ve learned our lesson, that we’ll never screw up again.

In other words, he's back to making more money off people who listen to him for financial advice, even though he was highly irresponsible with his money.  

Nowhere in the article does he write how he's looking to pay his bank back for welching on his loan or doing anything to give back to the community.  If the Carls of the world did not exist, the financial collapse and the loss of billions in retirement assets might have been prevented.  Thanks buddy!

Why Getting Ahead Is So Easy Today

If you are a financial adviser who decides to take out a 100% loan and screw the bank and the taxpaying public, you do not deserve to be a financial adviser anymore.  Your credentials should be stripped from you, just like how a convicted insider trader should be forever banned from working in the financial services industry.

After reading this article, why on earth would you ever rent?  I sure as hell will never rent again.  You can still borrow a ton of money from banks, live it up for years, and if you find yourself not wanting to pay, all you have to do is not pay, especially if you live in a non-recourse state!

The only consequence is a temporary hit to your credit score.  But who cares?  It comes back in several years.  It's not like you're getting thrown in jail or jabbed in the eyes with 10-inch long needles.  In fact, the government wants to help you out as much as possible.  You can even make $50,000 a year for free from the government if you buy a home and can't afford it!

Carl gets to write for the NY Times, promote his book, and earn money from dishing out money advice again. Isn't America great?

In all seriousness, real estate is one of the best ways to build wealth over the long term. Real estate makes up about 40% of my net worth as I own three properties in San Francisco, one in Lake Tahoe, and another in Honolulu. With over $150,000 in gross rents coming in, real estate gives me the freedom to never work again.

Wealth Building Recommendations

Explore real estate crowdsourcing opportunities. If you don't have the downpayment to buy a property, don't want to deal with the hassle of managing real estate, or don't want to tie up your liquidity in physical real estate, take a look at Fundrise, one of the largest real estate crowdsourcing companies today.

Real estate is a key component of a diversified portfolio. Real estate crowdsourcing allows you to be more flexible in your real estate investments by investing beyond just where you live for the best returns possible.

For example, cap rates are around 3% in San Francisco and New York City, but over 10% in the Midwest if you're looking for strictly investing income returns. Sign up and take a look at all the residential and commercial investment opportunities around the country Fundrise has to offer. It's free to look.

I personally have invested over $800,000 in 17 different real estate crowdfunding projects to earn income passively make money.

CrowdStreet is another great platform for accredited investors, if you want to invest in individual deals. They are focused on deals in 18-hour cities where valuations are lower and growth rates stood be faster.

Fundrise Due Diligence Funnel
Less than 5% of the real estate deals shown gets through the Fundrise funnel

Shop around for a mortgage: Check the latest mortgage rates online through Credible. They’ve got one of the largest networks of lenders that compete for your business.

Your goal should be to get as many written offers as possible and then use the offers as leverage to get the lowest interest rate possible from them or your existing bank. When banks compete, you win. Take advantage of all-time low mortgage rates post pandemic. You can get free, no-obligation quotes in minutes.

Why I'll never rent again

Updated for 2021 and beyond.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


79 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anon101
Anon101
2 years ago

I’ve been told since I was in my teens not to rent. That the gold-standard is owning a home. Have you been following home prices internationally? They’re exploding. So more pertinent than ever is the question how poor working-class people are supposed to own homes when jobs refuse to pay more than the bare minimum to survive AND homes are considered mere commodities? Even with crowdsourcing opportunities, one still has to make enough money both to survive AND to pay into the investment. And now in the State health insurance is required by law and is an additional fee on top of taxes, to say nothing of yet additional premiums if you do have to visit the clinic, many of us have even fewer pennies left over at the end of the month. This assumes there are no periodic emergencies (illness, layoffs, deaths in family…) that consume what little is saved.

Also, many financial advisers seem to assume that people are in relationships (married…) so can pool their earnings while saving on sharing housing, food, energy… costs. More and more of us are single so have to shoulder all the growing expenses of life on our own. Yet smaller savings for the downpayment or RE investment.

Oh, and what about the jobs situation, at least in the States? For decades now, jobs have been heading overseas where rights and costs are much more lax/lower. Since the financial collapse of 2008, in the US the jobs that have returned to the market are typically low-pay service positions. More and more people survive in the unstable, unreliable gig economy. That’s not conducive to paying a mortgage or into an investment consistently month after month–let alone qualifying for a mortgage.

The advice to own without addressing all these (and other pertinent) issues seems to me to apply to those who’re lucky enough to earn enough–and stably so–to qualify for a mortgage in the first place.

skrpune
skrpune
13 years ago

I have to say, if he was a financial planner at the time or purchase and didn’t bother to run the numbers, then he was a really bad financial planner. I’m self-taught when it comes to finances, and even I knew enough to turn down the max mortgage that I could get approved for. I don’t have much sympathy for folks who make really bad financial decisions – consumers need to educate themselves, and that applies to finances/mortgages as well.

And I have even less sympathy for this guy’s bad decisions since he’s a financial planner who “felt we could afford around $350,000” and yet when it came to buying a $575K home 100% financed PLUS adding a home equity LOC, he “never sat down to figure out what it would take to make this work. I just wanted to believe him. ” GAH! People, he may have learned his lesson, but seriously…if he’s that careless with his own money, I’d hate to see what he advised his clients to do with their money. RUN away from this financial planner!

Vegas baby
Vegas baby
13 years ago

As a final insult… I know this guy and he uses a ghost writer for his blog, NYT articles and book. He really is laughing all the way to the bank.

YFS
YFS
13 years ago

Well is credit took a hit and he will be in credit purgatory for quite awhile. He gets to write a book but, unless he’s a best selling author already I doubt he sells a lot of copies.

YFS
YFS
13 years ago

This guy Carl is a piece of shit. How can you call yourself a financial adviser and not follow your own advice. As start up RIA this really grinds my gears. All financial advisers should have to disclose their financial information to client prior to opening and account. If they do not have perfect credit it should be explained. If they have any debt it should be explained. so on and so forth. I agree 100% if a financial adviser does not have his financial house in order you should not be allowed to give advice.

AL
AL
13 years ago

Also, I’m currently looking into buying a rental property. It just doesn’t make sense in my area. A 1BR for $600-700K is a joke.

AL
AL
13 years ago

AL again. In response, I would say I’m intentionally eschewing the “plush lifestyle.” Living with others is a lot of fun and less stressful on the environment. I’m also able to save 80+ percent of my 250K+ income. It’s a win-win situation that helps me regain my freedom in the short term.

AL
AL
13 years ago

Sam,

Here are my reasons for renting. In my town, the median home price is over $1M. I live in a great neighborhood within a mile of my office. I rent a bedroom in a great house for $1200/mo. I have two great roommates and can easily socialize with others, if I want. If I were to buy the cheapest 1 BR in the same neighborhood, I would be paying more interest, taxes, and maintenance than my current rent, even when taking into account the deduction. I would consider buying if prices move significantly.

Donna Freedman
13 years ago

Thanks for this. The people who stuck with their home loans despite the difficulties are like those CEOs you mentioned: They just did the right thing and didn’t make a big deal about it.
That describes pretty much everyone I know. They look at the thing as, um, a CONTRACT: You sign on the line and then you make your payments, whether housing bubbles burst or not. It’s your home and you stick it out until you can make the final payment. If that means doing without things you want (or even need) due to factors like unemployment, the skyrocketing costs of food and fuel, or taxes that go up-up-up, then that’s what you do.
People like Carl make me tired. “I operated within the legal framework” is NOT the same as saying “I acted ethically/honorably.” I would ask “Is there no shame any more?” but I fear it’s a rhetorical question.

Jerry
13 years ago

I would be infuriated if I read his book and it might lead to others thinking that what he did was a smart thing which it wasn’t! We put 20% for our home, bought it in 2005 and now we rent it out and it just covers the mortgage, taxes and insurance. We’re glad we did it and we’re lucky we can rent it out. Ours is a lucky story but I know that there are many others who were not so lucky. If we didn’t have tenants we couldn’t afford the mortgage and the place we are living now and that scares us. But, we continue as we are and hope that things will get better.

Financial Samurai
13 years ago
Reply to  Jerry

Carl thanks you now for not bailing on your home and spending those extra hours finding a tenant and upkeeping! Cheers.

Monevator
Monevator
13 years ago

@Little House — I know how you feel. I stood aside from the UK property boom because prices in London were insane. Yet homeowners who over stretched themselves were bailed out by 0.5% interest rates because the Bank of England cannot let risking prices readjust. I know loads of people whose mortgages fell to near nothing.

At least prices have fallen in the US, which will help out prudent people like you in the long term.

Navin Patel
Navin Patel
13 years ago

I am in the fourth stage of retirement. Unfortunately I’m suffering from CGF(conjusted heart failure). I like to keep working but cannot even keep myself standing! I don’t own a home. any advice or suggestions for my later days? should i be able to buy any home to retire there for until the last day of my life? My ficco score is lower so i can not get mortgage but I have some $30K in savings.should i buy all cash and get my own home? There are some old houses (built in 1900-1930’s) for sale where I live at present. I am on SSD as an income.

lisa
lisa
13 years ago

@Evan I’m sorry I am not impressed with your reasoning or your argument. Nor am I the least bit impressed with your trying to blame a man who lost his home with raising our taxes. It was the inflation of the value of the homes by the banks that got them in trouble. They knew what they were doing. It is possible that this man has learned considerably from this experience, unfortunately, it seems you haven’t. If you plan to live in and retire in your home buy one. It is a buyers market. If you intend to move within 10 to 20 years do not buy a home you will not be able to sell it it is a buyers market. Carl lives in a free country. He can continue to work and make money just like the underhanded CEO’s of banks and big business despite using bailouts for bonuses. Nice try but not buying it:)

Financial Samurai
13 years ago
Reply to  lisa

Does that mean you don’t agree with my article as well?

Do you rent or own? And if you still rent, why? Carl shows you the way!

Gary
Gary
13 years ago

Great article. Carl should be de-CFP’d or the equivalent of a lawyer being disbarred. I can’t believe this idiot is making money off of his poor financial decisions, as a financial planner. Are the wealthy of Utah that gullible? Scary, we trust these people; maybe Madoff needs a cellmate… (just sayin’)

Financial Samurai
13 years ago
Reply to  Gary

Perhaps that’s why he moved? So that he could start a new and take in new unassuming clients. I bet that is correct! Carl is a smart man!

Janet
13 years ago

Good article. I read this previous article about Carl, and thought many of the same things. It used to be the risk of default was from those who lost their jobs or some other negative event, not just from those who lost their motivation to pay.

Darwin's Money
Darwin's Money
13 years ago

You left out the best part of the story… the ultimate GEM. He replied to a classified article with the word “securities” in it thinking he was applying for a security guard position. It turned out, it was in the “securities” industry. That’s your financial adviser – a guy who thought he was applying for a security guard position.

You can’t make this stuff up!

Now he’s selling books.

Great stuff.

JR
JR
13 years ago

The last 2 posts have it dead on. Far too many Carls around us who have absolutely NO consequences for their actions. If I had zero consequence for my behavior, I likely would not feel any accountability either.

Carl claims that he thought about his family at some point- I have difficulty accepting that statement. All the rest of Carl’s story indicates that he thought about little more than how he and his family were perceived; that it was all about facades. Even as he ends his tale, there seems little indication of actually having Learned anything more than how to shirk about, as Sam, as describes.

Carl lost little more than loans on paper. He even says that he did not pay any attention to what was in those loan contracts to the lenders. “Hey, if they are willing to lend to me I’ll take it all and then some!” Then took out additional equity loans. The only cash he had in was what he had re-paid to the multitude of loans.

I figure that we hold no one accountable at Carl’s level simply b/c we do not hold those higher accountable. As Sam posted the other day about Congress. When our lawmakers hold themselves out and essentially unaccountable to any rule or law they make, that mindset trickles down to other groups. As long as one group has something that does not apply, there will be another seeking something else. When there is a rule or law, it should apply equally to everyone w/o exception.

Financial Samurai
13 years ago
Reply to  JR

If he thought of his family first, he wouldn’t have risked so much financially.

He also writes, “I’m not sure if I’ve learned my lesson.” Ummmmm…… OK.

If financial advice is your profession, then this is a crying shame and a burden on the rest of us.

Buck Inspire
13 years ago

The same thing that makes this country so great is the same thing that allows the Carls to live his dream life. Double edged sword? No one is held accountable for their bad behavior. It’s easier to just kick the can down the road. It seems there are two types of people. Those who work the system and those who don’t. Nice guys finish last?

Marie at FamilyMoneyValues

Sam, your’e making people want to read his book!!!

I’m very annoyed at the Carl’s of the world (including my own neighbors that lived high on the hog for years in huge houses with no down and big mortgags).

I’m annoyed because their actions caused a downturn which caused my holdings to decrease in value.

I’m annoyed because their actions caused the Fed to lower interest rates to zip near zero at a time when I finally have some liqued assets and don’t need to borrow.

I’m annoyed because a whole LOT of people did this – from all walks of life, while I scraped by living below my means – makes me feel like a chump.

Diego
Diego
13 years ago

It must be the period, but this is the third post I’ve read in three days and that finds me in complete disagreement. Not only it goes back to the old, obsolete idea of “rent is dead money”, but it also shows a ton of “US only” thinking about properties. In most of the world, your mortgage is secured by each and every single asset you have, not only the house you bought. Your car, your laptop, your every single cent is a collateral. In some countries, even relatives can be held liable to some extent. Also, the concept of “personal bankruptcy” doesn’t exist in most parts of the world, hence you’ll pay your debts until you die (and it actually makes sense, or else everybody would be borrowing with the intention of defaulting).

So, in complete contrast with what has been written, do *not* take example from US and take reasonable decisions when it’s time to borrow. If you can’t afford it, simply don’t buy it. Rent is *not* dead money.

Diego
Diego
13 years ago

I wouldn’t push the suicide at all, but I also would not be so proud of shouting around that I’m a “strategic defaulter”. That’s the wrong attitude, and, fortunately, not so widespread.

Little House
13 years ago

I think I’ll barf now. Carl and many others like him, though not financial advisers or making money from book deals about how to walk away from your home, are screwing the system by walking away from their homes even though they can afford them. They are lemmings!

However, I still rent because, 1.) I was in the process of improving my credit during the housing boom so I didn’t want to take on something I knew I couldn’t afford, 2.) eventually once the house is gone, you gotta’ live somewhere and that will mean renting – so renting is really inevitable, 3.) I wanted to do the right thing and live within my means.

I completely agree that Carl should change occupations and should NOT be allowed to give financial advice to anyone.

Value Indexer
13 years ago

On the other side it’s not like banks never break moral rules to save a little money :) Morally bankrupt financial advisers vs banks that are insolvent without a little help from their taxpayer friends… are there even any winners in this? It seems more like all lose until a minimum 20% downpayment is required to buy a home.

Financial Samurai
13 years ago
Reply to  Value Indexer

Yep, “here you go customer! you can borrow 5X more, and you should!” No doubt.

The winner is Carl Richards as he laughs all the way to the bank.

101 Centavos
13 years ago

This guy’s a piece of work. What’s he whining about? Despite being an absolute moron with his personal finances, he’s allowed to work as a “certified” financial advisor.
I wonder if CFA’s are required to at least have a clean personal balance sheet as part of the certification process.

Financial Samurai
13 years ago
Reply to  101 Centavos

CFA is incredibly strict. Seriously, you do one thing bad and there’s a good chance you are stripped, just like if you have a Series 7.

CFPs…. not so much. Party on!

101 Centavos
13 years ago

PK, I understand that much of the land around Vegas is owned by the Federal Government. Sales of Federal Land to developers have kept the proceeds inside the State according to a special law (probably sponsored by Harry Reid :-) ). The funds were used for public projects, which enhanced property values, which drove more development, leading to more Federal land sales….